What are the units for the pollen population models shown?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a pollen viewer tool that displays historical plant populations from 21,000 BC to the present. Participants inquire about the units used in the models, with clarification provided that pollen diagrams typically measure pollen count per cubic centimeter. A specific diagram is highlighted for its interest, with a note on a dating discrepancy of 34 years that affects the transition to the Younger Dryas period. The corrected dating aligns closely with the GISP ice core data, although the error margin diminishes the perceived accuracy of the findings.
Mk
Messages
2,039
Reaction score
4
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Can't see the link So I'm not sure what exactly you want to know. Pollen diagrams like http://home.wanadoo.nl/bijkerk/meerfelder.GIF show the pollen count per cubic centimeter. You see filled black graphs and open white, that's a difference in order of magnitude. This specific one is extremely interesting. I have to write the others sometimes that their dating is 34 years off. The correction would bring their transition to the Younger Dryas to 11,654 years ago, whereas the transitition in the GISP ice core is 11,652 years. Unfortunately the error margin (+29 -26 years) spoils the apparent accuracy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/1760/snapshot200603041157516tz.png
Here it is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...
Back
Top