What are the units for the pollen population models shown?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the pollen population models displayed in the NOAA Pollen Viewer, which presents data from 21,000 BC to the present. The units for these models are expressed as pollen counts per cubic centimeter, as illustrated in various pollen diagrams. A specific example highlights a dating discrepancy of 34 years that affects the transition to the Younger Dryas, with corrections suggesting a transition date of 11,654 years ago, closely aligning with the GISP ice core data of 11,652 years. However, the error margin of +29 to -26 years undermines the perceived precision of these findings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pollen analysis and its significance in paleoclimatology.
  • Familiarity with the NOAA Pollen Viewer tool for visualizing historical pollen data.
  • Knowledge of the Younger Dryas period and its climatic implications.
  • Basic comprehension of error margins and their impact on scientific data interpretation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the NOAA Pollen Viewer for additional historical pollen data.
  • Research the significance of pollen counts in reconstructing past climates.
  • Study the Younger Dryas period and its relevance to climate change studies.
  • Learn about error analysis in paleoclimatological research and its implications.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in paleoclimatology, environmental scientists, and students interested in historical climate data and pollen analysis will benefit from this discussion.

Mk
Messages
2,040
Reaction score
4
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Can't see the link So I'm not sure what exactly you want to know. Pollen diagrams like http://home.wanadoo.nl/bijkerk/meerfelder.GIF show the pollen count per cubic centimeter. You see filled black graphs and open white, that's a difference in order of magnitude. This specific one is extremely interesting. I have to write the others sometimes that their dating is 34 years off. The correction would bring their transition to the Younger Dryas to 11,654 years ago, whereas the transitition in the GISP ice core is 11,652 years. Unfortunately the error margin (+29 -26 years) spoils the apparent accuracy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/1760/snapshot200603041157516tz.png
Here it is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K