What Are These Mysterious Objects Spotted Near Orion?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hijole
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    orion Weird
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the identification of mysterious objects observed near Orion, specifically focusing on images captured using the Aladin astro software. Participants explore potential explanations for these objects, considering various optical phenomena and telescope artifacts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests the objects may be internal reflections from the telescope, referring to them as "ghosts" associated with bright stars.
  • Another participant confirms this view, noting that the dark region in the images corresponds to the secondary mirror and its supports.
  • Several participants discuss the specific optical characteristics of the telescope, identifying it as a reflector and speculating on the type (Schmidt-Cass, Newtonian, or Dobsonian).
  • Context is provided regarding the source of the images, which are from the Digitized Sky Survey, indicating they may include artifacts from the imaging process.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between the observed objects and bright stars, particularly Sirius and Rigel, as potential sources of the reflections.
  • Participants inquire about the conditions under which internal reflections occur and whether similar artifacts can arise from other bright sources, such as quasars.
  • One participant mentions that while any object can produce a ghost image, the visibility of such images diminishes with the object's brightness.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the observed objects are likely internal reflections or "ghosts" caused by bright stars. However, there is ongoing exploration regarding the specifics of these reflections and their relationship to different types of celestial objects, indicating some unresolved aspects of the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the optical system's imperfections lead to unintended reflections, and the visibility of ghost images is contingent on the brightness of the source. The discussion does not resolve the technical details of how these reflections are produced in various contexts.

Who May Find This Useful

Astronomy enthusiasts, astrophotographers, and individuals interested in optical phenomena in telescopes may find this discussion relevant.

Hijole
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Hi all!

I am new here :)

I was observing Orion with the astro software Aladin and I found two similar relatively weird objects. I would like to share with you the image, with the zoom on each of them.

Any explanation? Could they be the same object (a satellite?) seen in two different moments?

Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • Whatsthat.png
    Whatsthat.png
    78.4 KB · Views: 212
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Looks like an internal reflection from the telescope to me - the dark region in the middle is the secondary mirror and the + pattern is its supports.

Paging a few of the astrophotographers - @collinsmark, @DennisN, @davenn.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and Hijole
Almost certainly what that is, yes. What make/brand of scope is it?
(It's obviously a reflector, so Schmidt-Cass, Newtonian or Dob).

Wait, this is a sim??

I think we need some context. What is the relationship between the three pics you've uploaded?
 
Thanks!

The image is from the Digitized Sky Survey, a ground-based imaging survey of the entire sky, performed with Palomar and UK Schmidt telescopes, producing photographic plates that were later digitized.
 
Oh. OK, I see the context now. A and B are labeled in the primary image. The right images are blow ups.

Here are some example 4-vane double spiders :
1630965997357.png

1630966035619.png


Here is where the "spider" goes in a generic reflector scope:
1630966239891.png

1630966309265.png


So the data that your Aladin software is using must be including these artifacts of the Palomar and UK Schmidt scopes.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Hijole
These are definitely internal reflections inside the telescope. They are usually referred to as "ghosts". They are usually associated with bright stars. No optical system is perfect, and it is very difficult to eliminate these because the bright stars are so much brighter than the surrounding regions. A is probably associated with Sirius in the lower left, and B could be a second ghost associated with Sirius or a ghost associated with Rigel.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hijole and DaveC426913
DaveC426913 said:
Oh. OK, I see the context now. A and B are labeled in the primary image. The right images are blow ups.

Here are some example 4-vane double spiders :
View attachment 288680
View attachment 288681

Here is where the "spider" goes in a generic reflector scope:
View attachment 288682
View attachment 288683

So the data that your Aladin software is using must be including these artifacts of the Palomar and UK Schmidt scopes.
Very clear, thank you! :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveC426913
phyzguy said:
These are definitely internal reflections inside the telescope. They are usually referred to as "ghosts". They are usually associated with bright stars. No optical system is perfect, and it is very difficult to eliminate these because the bright stars are so much brighter than the surrounding regions. A is probably associated with Sirius in the lower left, and B could be a second ghost associated with Sirius or a ghost associated with Rigel.
Hi phyzguy,

Thanks! Now I see, but why internal reflections are produced in the case of bright stars? Is also possible having ghosts in the case of other bright sources like quasars?
 
Hijole said:
Hi phyzguy,

Thanks! Now I see, but why internal reflections are produced in the case of bright stars? Is also possible having ghosts in the case of other bright sources like quasars?
Light is supposed to follow a certain path through the optical system, but there are always unintended refections. This site shows some ghost images that appear in the Hubble Space Telescope. Any object will have a ghost associated with it, but as the object gets fainter the ghost eventually gets so faint that it is undetectable. In theory a quasar will have a ghost associated with it, but the brightest known quasar (3C273) is about a million times fainter than Sirius, so the ghost would be invisible.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Hijole
  • #10
phyzguy said:
Light is supposed to follow a certain path through the optical system, but there are always unintended refections. This site shows some ghost images that appear in the Hubble Space Telescope. Any object will have a ghost associated with it, but as the object gets fainter the ghost eventually gets so faint that it is undetectable. In theory a quasar will have a ghost associated with it, but the brightest known quasar (3C273) is about a million times fainter than Sirius, so the ghost would be invisible.
Thank you for the clear (qualitative and quantitative) explanation!
 
  • #11
Ibix said:
Looks like an internal reflection from the telescope to me - the dark region in the middle is the secondary mirror and the + pattern is its supports.

Paging a few of the astrophotographers - @collinsmark, @DennisN, @davenn.
totally agree and it's Newtonian with the secondary and it's spider bracket -- as has been noted
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hijole

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K