I What Are These Mysterious Objects Spotted Near Orion?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hijole
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    orion Weird
AI Thread Summary
Two mysterious objects observed near Orion were identified as internal reflections, or "ghosts," caused by bright stars like Sirius and Rigel in the observer's telescope. The discussion clarified that these artifacts are common in optical systems, particularly with reflector telescopes, and are difficult to eliminate due to the brightness of the stars. The images shared were sourced from the Digitized Sky Survey, which includes these optical artifacts. It was noted that while any bright object could produce a ghost, fainter sources like quasars would create undetectable reflections. Overall, the conversation emphasized the nature of optical reflections in astrophotography and the challenges they present.
Hijole
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Hi all!

I am new here :)

I was observing Orion with the astro software Aladin and I found two similar relatively weird objects. I would like to share with you the image, with the zoom on each of them.

Any explanation? Could they be the same object (a satellite?) seen in two different moments?

Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • Whatsthat.png
    Whatsthat.png
    78.4 KB · Views: 184
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Looks like an internal reflection from the telescope to me - the dark region in the middle is the secondary mirror and the + pattern is its supports.

Paging a few of the astrophotographers - @collinsmark, @DennisN, @davenn.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and Hijole
Almost certainly what that is, yes. What make/brand of scope is it?
(It's obviously a reflector, so Schmidt-Cass, Newtonian or Dob).

Wait, this is a sim??

I think we need some context. What is the relationship between the three pics you've uploaded?
 
Thanks!

The image is from the Digitized Sky Survey, a ground-based imaging survey of the entire sky, performed with Palomar and UK Schmidt telescopes, producing photographic plates that were later digitized.
 
Oh. OK, I see the context now. A and B are labeled in the primary image. The right images are blow ups.

Here are some example 4-vane double spiders :
1630965997357.png

1630966035619.png


Here is where the "spider" goes in a generic reflector scope:
1630966239891.png

1630966309265.png


So the data that your Aladin software is using must be including these artifacts of the Palomar and UK Schmidt scopes.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes Hijole
These are definitely internal reflections inside the telescope. They are usually referred to as "ghosts". They are usually associated with bright stars. No optical system is perfect, and it is very difficult to eliminate these because the bright stars are so much brighter than the surrounding regions. A is probably associated with Sirius in the lower left, and B could be a second ghost associated with Sirius or a ghost associated with Rigel.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Hijole and DaveC426913
DaveC426913 said:
Oh. OK, I see the context now. A and B are labeled in the primary image. The right images are blow ups.

Here are some example 4-vane double spiders :
View attachment 288680
View attachment 288681

Here is where the "spider" goes in a generic reflector scope:
View attachment 288682
View attachment 288683

So the data that your Aladin software is using must be including these artifacts of the Palomar and UK Schmidt scopes.
Very clear, thank you! :)
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
phyzguy said:
These are definitely internal reflections inside the telescope. They are usually referred to as "ghosts". They are usually associated with bright stars. No optical system is perfect, and it is very difficult to eliminate these because the bright stars are so much brighter than the surrounding regions. A is probably associated with Sirius in the lower left, and B could be a second ghost associated with Sirius or a ghost associated with Rigel.
Hi phyzguy,

Thanks! Now I see, but why internal reflections are produced in the case of bright stars? Is also possible having ghosts in the case of other bright sources like quasars?
 
Hijole said:
Hi phyzguy,

Thanks! Now I see, but why internal reflections are produced in the case of bright stars? Is also possible having ghosts in the case of other bright sources like quasars?
Light is supposed to follow a certain path through the optical system, but there are always unintended refections. This site shows some ghost images that appear in the Hubble Space Telescope. Any object will have a ghost associated with it, but as the object gets fainter the ghost eventually gets so faint that it is undetectable. In theory a quasar will have a ghost associated with it, but the brightest known quasar (3C273) is about a million times fainter than Sirius, so the ghost would be invisible.
 
  • Informative
Likes Hijole
  • #10
phyzguy said:
Light is supposed to follow a certain path through the optical system, but there are always unintended refections. This site shows some ghost images that appear in the Hubble Space Telescope. Any object will have a ghost associated with it, but as the object gets fainter the ghost eventually gets so faint that it is undetectable. In theory a quasar will have a ghost associated with it, but the brightest known quasar (3C273) is about a million times fainter than Sirius, so the ghost would be invisible.
Thank you for the clear (qualitative and quantitative) explanation!
 
  • #11
Ibix said:
Looks like an internal reflection from the telescope to me - the dark region in the middle is the secondary mirror and the + pattern is its supports.

Paging a few of the astrophotographers - @collinsmark, @DennisN, @davenn.
totally agree and it's Newtonian with the secondary and it's spider bracket -- as has been noted
 
  • Like
Likes Hijole
Back
Top