Studying What Books Can Help Me Learn Physics on My Own?

AI Thread Summary
A mechanical engineering major with a minor in physics at San Jose State University seeks recommendations for books to deepen their understanding of physics, aspiring to become a theoretical physicist. They express a strong interest in learning beyond their coursework, despite not yet taking physics classes. Recommendations include "Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems" by Thornton and Marion for intermediate physics, "Introduction to Electrodynamics" by Griffiths for electricity and magnetism, and "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths for quantum physics. The discussion emphasizes the importance of balancing extracurricular learning with academic responsibilities, suggesting that students should focus on their courses first before investing in additional textbooks, which can be costly. The participant's passion for physics drives their desire to master the subject.
Henry Menendez
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
So, I am majoring in mechanical engineering with a minor in physics at San Jose State University. I want to learn as much as possible with physics by reading books and taking my future courses at SJSU, but I don't know what books to read. Any recommendations? I want to get pretty close to becoming a theoretical physicist, physics fascinates me and I want to become as knowledgeable as possible with the subject. Please help. I am very good with calculus, it comes very easily to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What kind of (specific) physics/mathematical background do you have? It depends on where you're starting from.
For intermediate physics, I learned using "Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems" by Thornton and Marion.
For electricity and magnetism, "Introduction to Electrodynamics," by Griffiths.
For quantum mechanics, "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics," by Griffiths.
All of these books have been very helpful for me. I find that the most effective way to teach yourself is to read the book, work problems, and ask your professors questions (but this should come as part of your classes as well).

I do have one other question, though. Why not just learn from your physics courses? Extracurricular learning is great, but you ought to have a full plate with your classes in Mech E and physics. Save the extra load for when you're done with your physics classes or for when you're sure you'll have free time. Most of these books are significant investments (expensive textbooks), so you'll want to be sure you will derive some benefit from them before buying.
 
anlon said:
What kind of (specific) physics/mathematical background do you have? It depends on where you're starting from.
For intermediate physics, I learned using "Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems" by Thornton and Marion.
For electricity and magnetism, "Introduction to Electrodynamics," by Griffiths.
For quantum mechanics, "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics," by Griffiths.
All of these books have been very helpful for me. I find that the most effective way to teach yourself is to read the book, work problems, and ask your professors questions (but this should come as part of your classes as well).

I do have one other question, though. Why not just learn from your physics courses? Extracurricular learning is great, but you ought to have a full plate with your classes in Mech E and physics. Save the extra load for when you're done with your physics classes or for when you're sure you'll have free time. Most of these books are significant investments (expensive textbooks), so you'll want to be sure you will derive some benefit from them before buying.
I'm not taking a physics course yet, not till next semester, so I'm roughly a month and a half away from taking one. And I just find a huge passion for physics like I want to know nearly everything about it. I want to not just learn physics, I want to perfect it. That's why I want to go over books and learn a lot. @anlon
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top