What Boundary Conditions Are Needed for Time-Dependent Hermitian Operators?

Je m'appelle
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
Hello, could you please give me an insight on how to get through this proof involving operators?

Proof:
Given an eigenvalue-eigenvector equation, suppose that the vectorstate depends on an external parameter, e.g. time, and that over it acts an operator that is the fourth derivative w.r.t. time. If this operator is hermitian, find the most general operator possible that satisfies these conditions and what are the boundary conditions on the eigenfunctions that are needed.
Attempt:

Using A as our hermitian operator and |\psi (t) \rangle for its time dependent eigenvector, and a(t) for its eigenvalue, I suppose the simplest eigenvalue-eigenvector equation one can write would be

A|\psi (t) \rangle = a(t) |\psi (t) \rangle

As for the operator, I'd say it follows directly that

A \sim \frac{\partial^4}{\partial t^4}

a(t) = a^*(t)

Now, based on the assumption I've been correct so far, comes the part where I'm stuck. I understand the general concept of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, i.e. a(t) would generate a set of eigenfunctions \psi(t), however I'm not fully aware which boundary conditions would be necessary from the provided information aside from the fact that a(t) is a real number. Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Je m'appelle said:
Hello, could you please give me an insight on how to get through this proof involving operators?

Proof:
Given an eigenvalue-eigenvector equation, suppose that the vectorstate depends on an external parameter, e.g. time, and that over it acts an operator that is the fourth derivative w.r.t. time. If this operator is hermitian, find the most general operator possible that satisfies these conditions and what are the boundary conditions on the eigenfunctions that are needed.
Attempt:

Using A as our hermitian operator and |\psi (t) \rangle for its time dependent eigenvector, and a(t) for its eigenvalue, I suppose the simplest eigenvalue-eigenvector equation one can write would be

A|\psi (t) \rangle = a(t) |\psi (t) \rangle

As for the operator, I'd say it follows directly that

A \sim \frac{\partial^4}{\partial t^4}

a(t) = a^*(t)

Now, based on the assumption I've been correct so far, comes the part where I'm stuck. I understand the general concept of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, i.e. a(t) would generate a set of eigenfunctions \psi(t), however I'm not fully aware which boundary conditions would be necessary from the provided information aside from the fact that a(t) is a real number. Any hints?
Bonjour "Je m'appelle"... En ce qui me concerne, moi je m'appelle Patrick :-)Write the operator as ##C \partial^4/\partial t^4 ## where C is a constant. What is the basic condition for such an operator to be hermitian?
 
nrqed said:
Bonjour "Je m'appelle"... En ce qui me concerne, moi je m'appelle Patrick :-)Write the operator as ##C \partial^4/\partial t^4 ## where C is a constant. What is the basic condition for such an operator to be hermitian?

Bonjour Patrick! Merci pour ta réponse. Ça va? As for your question, I'd say it's the operator being self-adjoint, i.e. A = A^{\dagger}, also I believe I know where you're going at, I should have written A = i \frac{\partial^4}{\partial t^4} instead?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top