I What can this observable represent?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter OhNoYaDidn't
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Observable
OhNoYaDidn't
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
## \hat{A}=
\begin{pmatrix}
1 &- 1 \\
-1&1
\end{pmatrix}
##
this is written in a basis ##\left ( |1>,|2> \right )##
So, i know this is an Hermitian operator, so it can represent an observable.
Can this operator represent an electric dipole moment? A momentum? A component of the orbital angular momentum?

1- for the momentum, i assume, since we can write ##\hat{p} ## as creation and annihilation operators, this would have no diagonal terms in this basis. What about the others, any suggestions?

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
OhNoYaDidn't said:
## \hat{A}=
\begin{pmatrix}
1 &- 1 \\
-1&1
\end{pmatrix}
##
this is written in a basis ##\left ( |1>,|2> \right )##
So, i know this is an Hermitian operator, so it can represent an observable.
Can this operator represent an electric dipole moment? A momentum? A component of the orbital angular momentum?

1- for the momentum, i assume, since we can write ##\hat{p} ## as creation and annihilation operators, this would have no diagonal terms in this basis. What about the others, any suggestions?

Thank you!
It is ##\mathbf{1} - \sigma_x## where ##\sigma_x## is a Pauli spin matrix but I can't think what observable it could be.
 
OhNoYaDidn't said:
## \hat{A}=
\begin{pmatrix}
1 &- 1 \\
-1&1
\end{pmatrix}
##
this is written in a basis ##\left ( |1>,|2> \right )##
So, i know this is an Hermitian operator, so it can represent an observable.
Can this operator represent an electric dipole moment? A momentum? A component of the orbital angular momentum?

1- for the momentum, i assume, since we can write ##\hat{p} ## as creation and annihilation operators, this would have no diagonal terms in this basis. What about the others, any suggestions?

Thank you!
It is singular and has one eigenvector [1,-1]. So it yields the probability a planer polarized photon will emerge from a polarized lens whose axis is at -45 degrees from the horizontal.
Here is a ? just in case I'm wrong.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top