What caused the teenager to die while charging her phone in the bath?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guineafowl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accident Charger
AI Thread Summary
A teenager tragically died while charging her phone in the bath, likely due to electrocution from a faulty charger. Discussions highlight concerns about the charger's isolation and the potential use of an extension cord, which may have contributed to the incident. There is speculation that the charger lacked necessary safety components, such as a class Y capacitor, which could lead to dangerous voltage exposure. The conversation emphasizes the need for better safety regulations regarding electrical devices used near water, as similar incidents have occurred in the past. The lack of detailed information about the circumstances surrounding the tragedy leaves many questions unanswered.
  • #101
NTL2009 said:
With all this talk of GFCI - I'd like to remind people to actually test theirs from time to time.

Excellent point. See those two buttons, one is RESET and the other is TEST. I don't know how the TEST button actually tests.

Ground-Fault-Circuit-Interupter-GFCI.png


Edit: I see @Guineafowl beat me to the punch.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #102
berkeman said:
Yes, I've read that she used an extension cord, but I'm not finding that news article at the moment. Looks like the parents have changed their story to claim that the phone was plugged into a bathroom outlet (which of course would have had GFCI protection).

That seems more likely, or even just water running down the USB cord to the extension cord outlet.
Older homes in the US have no GFCI protection. The home I grew up in had 2-wire outlets until recently.
 
  • #103
StandardsGuy said:
Older homes in the US have no GFCI protection. The home I grew up in had 2-wire outlets until recently.
It's odd to think about how GFCI works with a two wire system. It's almost as if the older systems were more efficiently designed, resource-wise, than the intermediate 3 wire system.

I'm speaking in the future tense of course.
 
  • #104


A timely video from ElectroBoom. The guy's a bit of a clown but does actually know what he's talking about. The video pretty much tracks the thread.

I just have to highlight the end, where he calls for American plugs to have sleeved pins, much like UK ones... ;) Yay UK!
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto and dlgoff
  • #105
OmCheeto said:
It's odd to think about how GFCI works with a two wire system.
I guess I can't see it that way. How can you be safer than insuring that the exact same current is on both wires? A third wire is irrelevant in this case. Last I knew it was still permitted in the USA to replace 2 wire kitchen countertop receptacles with a GFCI which would be ungrounded.
-
Edit: For that matter I believe it is permitted to do the same in a bathroom. Consider simply banning the replacement of an old two wire receptacle. Would this be safe? Extension cords throughout the house would be the result. The code has to weigh off the possibility of a probable scenario when something is mandated.
 
  • #106
Averagesupernova said:
Consider simply banning the replacement of an old two wire receptacle.
:ok:...

But why... ?
Averagesupernova said:
Extension cords throughout the house would be the result.
Two prong plugs will fit three prong outlets, won't they...?

Of course, there's always the good ol'... cheater plug.
 
  • #107
I'm just pointing out that in the USA it is permissible to leave two wire cables in the wall and replace the worn out receptacle. And in the case of a kitchen countertop or bathroom a GFCI receptacle would be required AND last I checked GFCI receptacles are not available without the third prong. They are required to be labeled as ungrounded and the safety a GFCI receptacle offers is considered good enough in these scenarios. I was also pointing out that it is unreasonable to simply consider an outlet replaced in this manner unsafe to the point of requiring a blank plate installed with a receptacle no longer available as it would lead to many many extension cords. Contrary to what many folks think, safety has tradeoffs and sometimes it is accepted that one installation is acceptable even though it is technically less safe than other installations.
 
  • #108
Averagesupernova said:
I was also pointing out that it is unreasonable to simply consider an outlet replaced in this manner unsafe to the point of requiring a blank plate installed with a receptacle no longer available as it would lead to many many extension cords.
:ok:... that answered both the questions, thank you.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top