What Causes Different Acceleration Calculations in Sled Dynamics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johndoe3344
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the physics of sled dynamics, specifically calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction and the acceleration of a boy sliding down a hill on a sled. The correct coefficient of kinetic friction is determined to be 0.161. However, there is a discrepancy in calculating the acceleration down the slope, with the user obtaining 1.579 m/s² while the book states it should be 1.01 m/s². The error arises from misunderstanding the normal force, which should be calculated as mg cos(15 degrees) instead of just mg. The correct approach involves considering the net forces acting on the system to accurately determine the sled's acceleration.
johndoe3344
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
A boy drags his 60.0-N sled at constant speed up a 15 degree hill. He does so by pulling with a 25-N force on a rope attached to the sled. If the rope is inclined at 35 degrees to the horizontal,
(a) what is the coefficient of knetic friction between sled and snow?
(b) At the top of the hill, he jumps on the sled and slides down the hill. What is the magnitude of his acceleration down the slope?

I understand how to do part a. I get the correct answer: 0.161. However, I try to do part b, and I get a different answer than the back of the book. Here are my steps:

Fk = uk*n ; n = mg
Fk = uk*mg = ma
a = uk*g

I plug in the numbers and get 1.579 m/s/s, while the back of the book gets 1.01 m/s/s.

What am I doing wrong? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the boy and the sled as a system
There are three forces acting on the system,
their weight
force of friction
and, normal reaction.
Here n is not equal to mg but mgcos(15)
the net force along the incline is mgsin(15)-fk=mg(sin(15)-ukcos(15))
Hence the acceleration is"g(sin(15)-ukcos(15))"

Keep Smiling
Malay
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top