What Causes Errors in Newton's Second Law Experiments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fact file
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Errors
AI Thread Summary
Errors in experiments related to Newton's Second Law can stem from various factors, including measurement inaccuracies and equipment calibration issues. Specific sources of error can be difficult to identify without detailed information about the experimental setup and measurements taken. Recommendations for improvement include consulting resources like John Taylor's "An Introduction to Error Analysis" for understanding error propagation and calculation. Properly applying formulas for error analysis can help clarify the relationship between measured quantities and their uncertainties. Addressing these factors can enhance the accuracy of the experiment's results.
fact file
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am writing a lab report on Newton's second law...:) I got some errors while calculating the slope (mass).

What factors could bring out those errors? and How can they be imporved?

I don understand what i m suppose to approach...If anybody cud help me with that...thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without knowing any details of the experiment- without knowing what you measured- it's tough to say where the sources of error are.

John Taylor's book "An Introduction to error analysis" is a must-read, but to distill down some formulas: I'm new to the latex stuff, so let's hope I get the formulas correct...

if q = Bx, and B is known exactly, then \delta q = B \delta x
if q = q(x), then \deltaq=|dq/dx|\delta x

I'll stop there and see if my typesetting is ok.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top