What Causes Imbalance in Rotating Bodies?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of imbalance in rotating bodies and the role of centrifugal force. It highlights that centrifugal force is a pseudo force observed in non-inertial reference frames, while in inertial frames, such as one attached to Earth, it does not exist. The imbalance in a rotating body is attributed to the acceleration of the center of mass when forced to rotate around a point that does not coincide with it. This results in an unbalanced force acting on the base of the rotating system, which can be explained through Newton's laws of motion. Ultimately, understanding the reference frame is crucial for analyzing the forces at play in rotating bodies.
koolraj09
Messages
166
Reaction score
5
Hi,
I've read about the balancing of rotating masses. In the context every author(even J.E.Shigley in his book Theory of machines & mechanisms) mentions that a rigid body while rotating, it experiences a "Centrifugal Force" .
Now we know that centrifugal force is a pseudo force when we analyze the motion of the body when our co-ordinate system is attached to the body.
In other case when we analyze the motion of the body when our co-ordinate system is attached to Earth (inertial reference frame) there wouldn't be any centrifugal force which would then be unbalanced. So, whether the body is balanced or not depends on our selection of reference frame. I don't think that a centrifugal force is the cause of unbalance though the magnitude of unbalanced force equals/resembles that of a centrifugal force.
So,which is the force then responsible for imbalance? Detailed analysis would be appreciated.
Thanks in Advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The centrifugal force which appears in a non-inertial reference frame usually ends up being explained away in an inertial reference frame.

If you analyze a system from non-inertial frame, such as taking an object in a spinning room and working from the reference of the room, the object will appear to move toward the outside of the room and stick to the wall. Applying the inertial laws of motion to this frame the only way to account for this is to add a force to move the object. This would be a centrifugal force.

If you take the same scenario from an inertial reference frame, using the laws of motion you find that this "centrifugal force" is actually just the objects inertia resisting the spinning of the room, coupled with normal forces.
 
My question is:
we know that centrifugal force is a pseudo force when we analyze the motion of the body when our co-ordinate system is attached to the body.
In other case when we analyze the motion of the body when our co-ordinate system is attached to Earth (inertial reference frame) there wouldn't be any centrifugal force which would then be unbalanced. So, whether the body is balanced or not depends on our selection of reference frame.
This is contradictory somewhere. So what force is responsible for unbalance? Detailed derivation of force will be of great help.
 
In inertial frame, or something sufficiently close, like Earth frame, the motion of a rigid body, such as the centrifuge, can be decomposed into translational motion of center of mass, and rotation around center of mass. The former follows the Newton's Second Law. If the body is forced to rotate around a point that does not coincide with center of mass, center of mass is accelerating. That means there is a force applied to the centrifuge, and by Newton's Third to the base of the centrifuge. Since the acceleration of mass is always towards center of rotation, the force applied to the base is also rotating with the same angular frequency. There is your unbalance force in inertial frame.

Does that help?
 
Ya surely. Thanks.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top