What Causes Oscillatory Motion in a Particle with a Constant Force?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the dynamics of a particle subject to a constant force that changes direction at x=0, raising questions about potential energy and oscillatory motion. It is established that if a potential energy exists, it must not be derivable at x=0, similar to the function |x|. The equations of motion suggest a linear and quadratic dependence on time, leading to confusion about the nature of oscillation. Participants compare the scenario to gravity, noting that the period of oscillation will depend on initial conditions such as position and velocity. Ultimately, the period can also be calculated based on the total energy of the system.
Rulonegger
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle with mass m which can move only in one dimension, is subject to a constant force
F= \begin{cases}-F_{0} && x>0\\F_{0} && x<0\end{cases} with F_{0}>0.
First I've got to say if there is a potential energy. Then i must solve the particle dynamics (i.e. find v(t) and x(t) for all t), finding the period of the oscillatory motion in terms of the mass m, the force F_{0} and some amplitude coefficient A.

Homework Equations


Supposing that there is a potential U, it must satisfy that
\vec{F}=-\nabla{U}
just pointing out that the potential (if it exists) shouldn't be derivable in x=0, just like the function |x|.

The Attempt at a Solution


When i try to write down the equations of motion, and i solve for x, i get that the position is linearly proportional to the time t plus some quadratic dependence of the time, so i don't know where the oscillatory motion comes from.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rulonegger said:

Homework Statement


A particle with mass m which can move only in one dimension, is subject to a constant force
F= \begin{cases}-F_{0} && x>0\\F_{0} && x<0\end{cases} with F_{0}>0.
First I've got to say if there is a potential energy. Then i must solve the particle dynamics (i.e. find v(t) and x(t) for all t), finding the period of the oscillatory motion in terms of the mass m, the force F_{0} and some amplitude coefficient A.

Homework Equations


Supposing that there is a potential U, it must satisfy that
\vec{F}=-\nabla{U}
just pointing out that the potential (if it exists) shouldn't be derivable in x=0, just like the function |x|.

The Attempt at a Solution


When i try to write down the equations of motion, and i solve for x, i get that the position is linearly proportional to the time t plus some quadratic dependence of the time, so i don't know where the oscillatory motion comes from.

It's a force just like gravity, except when you cross x=0 gravity reverses. Write down a solution for x>0 and then match it onto one for x<0.
 
Oscillation

Yeah, i see your comparison, but intuitively i think the motion should be like a sinusoidal function of time, but the period of oscillation is?
 
Rulonegger said:
Yeah, i see your comparison, but intuitively i think the motion should be like a sinusoidal function of time, but the period of oscillation is?

If you throw a ball up in the air the time it takes to come back depends on how fast you throw it. Same thing with the period of oscillation here. It will depend on the initial position and velocity. Or you could calculate it as a function of the total energy.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top