What chronology of Bell inequalities testing ?

limarodessa
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hi all !


What chronology of Bell inequalities testing ( their violation ) ?

What positive and negative aspects of each experiment ?

What experiments have been spent latest years ?

Some material:

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0310/0310192v1.pdf


Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
limarodessa said:
Hi all !

What chronology of Bell inequalities testing ( their violation ) ?

What positive and negative aspects of each experiment ?

What experiments have been spent latest years ?

Thanks.

Aspect et al, circa 1981, was the early watershed. This included the feature that the polarization settings were changed midflight and showed about 5 standard deviations of confidence. The next biggie was Weihs et al, 1998, which improved substantially on the strict localization of Alice and Bob by separating them by over 2 kilometers.

Aspect wrote on the progress a few years back in this article:
http://www-ece.rice.edu/~kono/ELEC565/Aspect_Nature.pdf

A good summary of the state of Bell tests and theory development is here (106 pages, 505 references, as of 2007):
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0701071
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top