What Condition Determines Eigenket of A?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zhaiyujia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition
zhaiyujia
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that |\alpha> and |\beta> are eigenkets(eigenfunctions) of a hermitian operator A. Under what condition can we conclude that |\alpha> + |\beta> is also an eigenket of A?

Homework Equations


It's quite basic, I don't think any addtional equations are needed except the definations.

The Attempt at a Solution


From the question we know that A| \alpha > =a|\alpha> , A|\beta> =b|\beta>. And A is a hermitian operator:
<\alpha|A\beta>=<\alpha|b\beta>=b<\alpha|\beta>,
<\alpha|A\beta>=<A\alpha|\beta>=<a\alpha|\beta>=a<\alpha|\beta>,
Therefore a=b? or <\alpha|\beta>=0?
But it's nothing to do with |\alpha>+|\beta>+
It seems no addition is need to constrain on them
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zhaiyujia said:
It seems no addition is need to constrain on them
Of course not; you never applied the condition that |\alpha\rangle + |\beta\rangle is to be an eigenket!
 
But what is the condition? if my first part is right:
A(|\alpha>+|\beta>)=a(|\alpha>+|\beta>)
is automatic right?
 
Well, no, it's not automatic. Your first part said
"a = b" or "\langle \alpha | \beta \rangle = 0".​

So, you have to consider both cases, not just the "a = b" case.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top