What could be causing discrepancies in my derived formula for max. LOS range?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the formula for the line-of-sight (LOS) maximum range from a tower based on its height. The derivation involves visualizing the tower and the point of maximum range as forming a right triangle with the Earth's center. The angle subtended at the Earth's center is calculated using the formula cos-1(R/(R+h)), where R is the Earth's radius and h is the tower height. The arc length, representing the LOS distance, is then expressed as l = R*cos-1(R/(R+h)). However, discrepancies arise when applying this formula to textbook problems, leading to doubts about the initial assumptions. A suggestion is made that the issue may stem from the calculator settings, specifically whether it is in degrees or radians mode.
Rex Galilae
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I went through my Physics textbook where we have a chapter on Communication systems. There's a certain section where they show us the formula for the LOS max. range for a tower with a given height (say h) but I, unsatisfied with it, set out to derive it myself at home and wasn't convinced with the results.
LOS.jpg

First off, I assumed that the max. LOS range can be thought of as the length of the arc subtended by the tower and the point of max range at the center of the Earth. If we draw a line from the top of the tower to the max. range point, it hits the surface of Earth tangentially.
Connect the base of the tower and the max. range point to the center of the Earth and we get a right triangle (since the line is tangential to the surface of Earth). Using trigonometry, we find out that the angle subtended at the center (θ) by these two points (green) can be expressed as cos-1(R/R+h) where R is the Radius of the Earth.
Now that we have the angle, it's easy to calculate the length of the arc (i.e. the distance b/w the tower and the point of max. range) by using this simple formula which is l = R*θ.
This gives us that l = R*cos-1(R/R+h).

(You can use the small angle approximation to refine the formula a bit)
But then, when I used this formula to calculate LOS max. range problems from the book, my answers were a long way off their values. I'm doubting that something is wrong with my first assumption. Pls. help!
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Hi Rex:

What you show looks OK to me. Can you post an example of the book's value together with your corresponding calue?

Regards,
Buzz
 
I bet your calculator is set to "degrees mode" instead of "radians mode".
 
In my discussions elsewhere, I've noticed a lot of disagreement regarding AI. A question that comes up is, "Is AI hype?" Unfortunately, when this question is asked, the one asking, as far as I can tell, may mean one of three things which can lead to lots of confusion. I'll list them out now for clarity. 1. Can AI do everything a human can do and how close are we to that? 2. Are corporations and governments using the promise of AI to gain more power for themselves? 3. Are AI and transhumans...
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...
Back
Top