What Defines a d0 Complex in Inorganic Chemistry?

AI Thread Summary
A d0 complex in inorganic chemistry is defined as a metal complex where the central metal atom has no d electrons available for bonding. This typically occurs in metals that are in a high oxidation state, resulting in the complete filling of their d orbitals. In such complexes, the bonding primarily involves s and p orbitals from the metal and the ligands. Understanding d0 complexes is crucial for molecular orbital analysis, as these complexes exhibit unique electronic properties. The inquiry highlights the need for clearer definitions in academic resources to aid in the study of such complexes.
salazar888
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to perform a molecular orbital analysis of a tungsten hydride complex, (WH6) and I haven't been able to find an intuitive or basic definition for a "d0 complex". Every time I read an article about a d0 complex they tangentially mention them and then jump into the problem.

Homework Equations



What is the definition of a d0 complex?

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it referred to any complex where the d orbital electrons do not directly participate in the bonding between the metal and its ligands. I just want a pure definition. Thank you so much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes sir, greatly appreciated.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top