What Determines the Direction of Potential Gradient?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the direction of the potential gradient in relation to electric fields and equipotential surfaces. The participant believes the correct answer is C, as it moves opposite to the electric field and intersects the most equipotential surfaces. Another user confirms that the answer is indeed C. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between electric fields and potential gradients. The clarity of the solution is appreciated by the original poster.
Yosty22
Messages
182
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Attached.

Homework Equations



E=-∇V

The Attempt at a Solution



I think that the answer is C because it goes in the direction opposite the electric field and crosses through the most equipotential surfaces. Any confirmation or denial would be great.
Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • Gradient Question.jpg
    Gradient Question.jpg
    19.2 KB · Views: 500
Physics news on Phys.org
Just in case it is hard to look at, I rotated the attachment to make it easier.
 

Attachments

  • Gradient Question.jpg
    Gradient Question.jpg
    28.5 KB · Views: 506
Yosty22 said:

Homework Statement



Attached.


I think that the answer is C because it goes in the direction opposite the electric field and crosses through the most equipotential surfaces. Any confirmation or denial would be great.
Thank you.

Yes, it is C.


ehild
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

The sign of the change in potential
Replies
7
Views
413
Potential Gradient of potentiometer wire
Replies
2
Views
4K
Gravitational equipotential multiple choice problem
Replies
4
Views
2K
Why Does Charge Density Increase at Pointed Ends?
Replies
4
Views
3K
Show that force is proportional to gradient of PE graph
Replies
13
Views
3K
Electric Potential and Field Diagram - True/False
Replies
6
Views
2K
Equipotential surface and electric field
Replies
8
Views
2K
Why Is Work Positive When Done Against the Electric Field?
Replies
22
Views
3K
Potential difference between two points in an electric field
Replies
1
Views
2K
The potential difference of a proton
Replies
4
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top