What Determines the Force at the Bottom of a Circular Loop?

  • Thread starter Thread starter darksyesider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Hill
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the force at the bottom of a circular loop in a frictionless scenario, starting from rest. Participants highlight the importance of knowing the radius to solve the problem effectively, with suggestions that it might be twice the height (2h). The derived formula for the normal force is presented as F_N = m(2gy)/r + mg, leading to a force factor of 5 when substituting y = 2r. There is some confusion regarding the definition of the force factor, but the calculations appear to be accepted by the group. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on the radius to arrive at a definitive solution.
darksyesider
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
[Solved] bottom of hill

Homework Statement



No friction, starts at rest.
What is the force factor at the bottom of the circular loop?
(see attachment)

Homework Equations



Conservation of Energy Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



EDIT: Solved below (incorrect solution was here)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi darksyesider! :smile:
darksyesider said:
Then from here I don't know what to do since the radius is not given. (see diagram)

yes, you certainly need to know the radius :confused:

i'll guess it's supposed to be 2h
 
I think this problem is missing the radius. I don't see how else to solve it.
 
yes :smile: try 2h
 
So is the answer 5 times?

I got:

F_N = \dfrac{m(2gy)}{r}+mg

= mg(\dfrac{2y}{r}+1)

Since force factor = Fa/Fg

ff = \dfrac{mg(\dfrac{2y}{r} + 1 )}{mg}

Substituting in y = 2r we get 5 times.
 
if force factor = Fa/Fg, yes :smile:
 
Sorry, but is that the incorrect definition? :(
I can't find any other definition of it…
And thanks a lot for the help!
 
darksyesider said:
Sorry, but is that the incorrect definition?

i've never heard of it before :redface:

but I'm happy to take your word for it … and if it is, your answer looks fine :smile:
 

Similar threads

Back
Top