What Determines the Isomorphism of G/X in Group Theory?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the isomorphism of the quotient G/X in the context of a simply connected group G of 3x3 upper triangular matrices. The center Z(G) is identified as a subgroup isomorphic to C, leading to discrete subgroups X that are lattices of rank 1 or 2. The main objective is to demonstrate that G/X is determined up to isomorphism by the one-dimensional quotient Z(G)/X. Participants are encouraged to start with definitions, explore the implications of quotienting by X, and consider the uniqueness of G/X for different X's sharing the same Z(G)/X. The conversation emphasizes the importance of problem-solving strategies in tackling mathematical questions effectively.
arz2000
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Consider the simply connected group G of all 3 by 3 matrices
[1 a b
0 1 c
0 0 1 ]
where a,b,c are in C. The center of G is the subgroup
Z(G)={ [1 0 b
0 1 0
0 0 1] ; b is in C}
So Z(G) is isomorphic to C and therefore the discrete subgroups of Z(G) are just lattices X of rank 1 or 2.
Now show that G/X is determined up to isomorphism by the one-dimensional
Z(G)/X.

Can anybody help me solve it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What have you tried to do?
 
In fact I don't know what should I do?
 
You start with the definitions. As you always do. You look at what happens when you quotient out by X. You suppose that there are two different X's that have the same quotient Z(G)/X and try to figure out why the G/X are different. In short you think about it for a while and play around with things until you get a better idea of what's going on.

Get yourself a copy of Polya's how to solve it and read it. Your problems don't seem to have anything to do with the mathematics of this particular question, or any of the ones you post, but with not knowing how to attack problems.
 
Thanks for your help.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top