What Determines the Spin and Parity of a Nucleus with Multiple Excited Nucleons?

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
I understand that the spin and parity of the nucleus is determined by looking at hte unpaired nucleon (is that the correct way of saying it?). But what if we were looking at nulceus where 2 or more nucleons were excited from the ground state?? What would the spin and parity of the nucleus be, then??

What if we had a lithium-7 (Z=3) nucleus, say where the a proton from 1s_{1/2}was excited (by some means) to the 2s_{1/2} state. Now we have 2 unpaired protons, one in the 1p_{3/2} state and the 2s_{1/2}

what would the spin and the parity of this nucleus be??

Do we still look at the unpaired nucleon in teh outermost shell only??
In this case, then the spin would be (1/2)^+, since the j value of the outermost nucleon in 1/2 and l=0.

(Spin and parity is given by i^{\pi}
where i=j
and \pi = (-1)^l)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Old stuff, but let's give an answer: All unpaired nucleons contribute to spin and parity, that is ALL three protons. Smallest possible spin is 1/2 and highest 5/2. Parity is evidently negative (1s and 2s protons contribute nothing, the p proton contributes negative).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top