What did I do wrong? (Newton's Second Law)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a 500N ball on a 24° decline, where the ball accelerates from 1 m/s to 32 m/s over a distance of 6.1 m. The user attempts to calculate the coefficient and force of kinetic friction, using equations related to Newton's Second Law. However, the calculated acceleration appears unreasonably low at 0.0004 m/s², leading to an implausibly small coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.000040775. The user seeks feedback on the accuracy of their calculations and the reasonableness of their results. The overall inquiry highlights potential errors in the application of the equations and assumptions made in the problem-solving process.
glenohumeral13
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


(This is a problem I made up, so if the problem is with the problem, let me know.)
A 500N ball is being pushed down a carpeted decline of 24° to the horizontal. It starts from 1 m/s and ends the 20 foot (6.1 m) decline at 32 m/s. What is the coefficient and force of kinetic friction and applied force?

Homework Equations


I used:
Fg = mag, F = ma, a = μkg, and vi = √(vf2 - (2ad)).

The Attempt at a Solution


Fg = mag
50N = m(9.81)
m = 5kg
vi = √(vf2 - (2ad))
1 = √(322 - 2a(6.1))
1 = √(1024 - 12.2a)
1 = √(1011.8a)
1 = 38√(a)
1/38 = √(a)
.022 = a
a = .0004 m/s2
F = ma
F = 5*.0004
F = .002N
a = μkg
.0004 = μk(9.81)
μk = .000040775
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does that value for "a" seem reasonable to you?

I know the equation as...

vf2 = vi2 + 2ad

2ad = vf2 - vi2

a = (vf2 - vi2)/2d

a = (1024 - 1) / (2*6.1)
= 84m/s2
 
PS: It may not be your only error. I haven't checked.
 
CWatters said:
Does that value for "a" seem reasonable to you?

I know the equation as...

vf2 = vi2 + 2ad

2ad = vf2 - vi2

a = (vf2 - vi2)/2d

a = (1024 - 1) / (2*6.1)
= 84m/s2
Thanks.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top