Finding Unknowns in Circuits: Using Loop Rules and Substitution

  • Thread starter Thread starter queenspublic
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving circuit problems using Kirchhoff's loop rules and junction rule. Participants emphasize the importance of showing calculations clearly and suggest starting with loop rules before making substitutions for currents. There is a caution against assuming equal currents without verification. The conversation highlights the potential complexity of the algebra involved in circuit analysis. Overall, the emphasis is on methodical problem-solving to find unknowns in circuits.
queenspublic
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



200910191819456339157318523437509945.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show your calculations.
 
I'm not sure, what have you used to solve the problem?

Did you use Kirchoff's loop rules and the junction rule?
 
rl.bhat said:
Show your calculations.

20091022048356339011331534187507861.gif


Hello?
 
Last edited:
I don't know what you did but the assumption that i2 = i3 may not be correct.

I would do the loop rules first (the Vb -Va part you wrote) then at the last moment do a substitution i3 = i1 - i2 (assuming the same directions you chose for your current)

you should then end up with two equations and two unknowns. (the potential diff by going through left loop and the right loop.

From the looks of this circuit, this should have some annoying algebra, but I don't believe there's a better way.


So as another hint in case you still can't get it:
The loop rule is that the potential difference by going on in a loop is zero.
Going around the loop to the left, assuming the current i1 is going clockwise on the left part of loop and i3 is going up for the middle part of the circuit:

E1 - i1R1 +i3R2 -E2 -i1R1 = 0

You can get the equation for the second loop the same way.

Then you can use i1 -i2 = i3 (junction rule) to get three equations, three unknowns (i1, i2, i3)

It is important you understand how the equation resulting from the loop rule is obtained. When you move along the current across a resistor, you lose I * R in potential difference, and when you move opposite to the current, you gain I * R in current. For batteries (Emf), it's the opposite, you gain potential difference when you're moving with the battery's arrow, and negative when you're moving against (current does not matter here).

Please note this is just a trick and what is really happening in the circuit is not exact.

Good luck!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top