What distribution should i use?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rsala004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distribution
rsala004
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Player1 makes the bet.
the 2nd player has a 32% chance to accept the bet.
the 3rd player has a 56% chance to accept the bet.
the 4th player has a 20% chance to accept the bet.

there can only be one winner of said bet, so player one is interested in knowing the EXPECTED number of players that will call his bet (how much competition will he have)

(we can make the assumption that the % chance of a player accepting the bet does not change depending on the # of players accepted before him..they aren't that smart)

anyone have an idea how I can approach this?

haven't taken stats in a while
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question doesn't seem to be clear . I assume there are only 2 outcomes to a bet - win or lose . Now you say that no more than 1 player can win the bet , but how can that be :
If player 1 makes the bet , and then player 2 and player 3 accepts the bet , but player 4 declines .

If player 1 loses the bet then that means player 2 and 3 have won . But you said that no more than 1 player can win the bet. How come ?
 
The average number of players accepting the bet is 32% + 56% + 20%, of course.
 
CRGreathouse said:
The average number of players accepting the bet is 32% + 56% + 20%, of course.

lol so obvious i didnt notice.
 
rsala004 said:
lol so obvious i didnt notice.

...and that's what we're here for.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top