What Do K and Alpha Represent in Yukawa's Potential?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ayame17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
Ayame17
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
This may seem like a really obvious question to those that know it but...

We looked at Yukawa's potential the other day, in the form W(r)=\frac{\alpha}{r}*e^{-Kr}, but our lecturer never explained what K and \alpha actually are! I've looked on the net and all I can find is that they are constants. What does they actually stand for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Roughly speaking, alpha is a constant representing the "strength" of the force... for the EM force it would be the fine structure constant. K is a constant representing the inverse of the range of the force R\approx \frac{\hbar}{Mc}. (M is the mass of the mediating boson). For the EM force R would be infinite, so K would be 0.

Ref: Particle Physics, Martin and Shaw, 3rd Ed.
 
Ah, now that makes a lot of sense! Thanks very much!
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top