What do the primes mean in this differential equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FredericGos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation Weird
FredericGos
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm reading an old book titled 'Mathematics of classical and quantum physics' by byron & fuller. It's quite nice, but some of the notation confuses me.

On page 388, they're showing a simple differential equation:

-i\frac{dy}{dx}=f(x)

fine, but then they write the solution (given the initial condition y(a)=y0) as:

y(x) = y0 + i\int_a^x f(x')dx'

These primes don't make any sense to me. What's up? Especially the one on the differential.
I would just have written the same thing without the primes.

I exspect this to be some kind of outdated notation, but it could also be that it just is something I've never seen. Can anyone tell me what's going on?

thx
Frederic
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think it's just another way to say y(x)=y(0)+i\int f(x) dx.
 
That x' is just a dummy variable. The only difference between this text and a more modern one is that the more modern text will use greek letters:

y(x) = y_0 + i\int_a^x f(\xi)d\xi
 
The notation isn't outdated. The integral needs to be a function of x in order to make the equation make sense, and so the upper limit is x. Then, x' is a dummy variable-- this can really be anything you like (apart from x!).
 
Thx guys, of course! I get it now. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top