What Does 0.1 Expected Photon Per Pulse Mean in Quantum Cryptography?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phonon44145
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Per Photons Pulse
phonon44145
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Maybe a stupid question, but anyway. The paper "Experimental Quantum Cryptography" by C. Bennettet al. discusses laser pulses of 0.1 expected photon per pulse. What does that mean physically? Is it that 90% of laser pulses are not pulses at all, containing no photons and thereby no energy? Or are these pulses real in the same sense as wave function is real and the photon wave function can collapse into anyone of the pulses? Or is it that each pulse is a Schrodinger Cat superposition between emitted and non-emitted photon? If it can be of any help, another paper on the same topic (S. N. Molotkov, "Integration of Quantum Cryptography into fiber-optic telecommunication systems") claims that laser radiation(coherent state) has Poisson statistics in the photon number. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think that this is a stupid question! because I have a similar question involving Rabi oscillations of state probabilities induced by photons or parts of photons. Since this tread is do old, I'll post my question as a new thread.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top