What does band gap bowing means?

gjfelix2001
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
what does "band gap bowing" means?

Hi, i speak spanish, and I've tried to translate the term "band gap bowing", but literally it doesn't have any sense. So, can anyone explain this term to me so i can translate it correctly?? Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "band gap" is the energy gap between the valence band and conduction bads. "Bowing" is a synonym for "bending."

So "band gap bowing" refers to a bending of the band gap.

- Warren
 
gjfelix2001 said:
Hi, i speak spanish, and I've tried to translate the term "band gap bowing", but literally it doesn't have any sense. So, can anyone explain this term to me so i can translate it correctly?? Thanks a lot.
The equivalent term in Spanish is "curvatura de la banda prohibida".
More generally, "band bowing" corresponds to "curvatura de bandas".
 
gjfelix2001 said:
Hi, i speak spanish, and I've tried to translate the term "band gap bowing", but literally it doesn't have any sense. So, can anyone explain this term to me so i can translate it correctly?? Thanks a lot.

generally in relation to alloy formation band gap bowing refers to the deviation away from a linear combination of the two end materials.

e.g. material A has a band gap of X, material B has a band gap of Y.

the band gap of the AB alloy = 1/2(X)+1/2(Y)-1/4B, where B is the band gap bowing coefficient.

i hope that helps.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top