What Does Black Light Do to a Blackbody?

  • Thread starter Thread starter philrainey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blackbody Light
philrainey
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
if a wave of light intermingles with another the same but of opposite phrase I believe you get what is called black light. If the black light hits a blackbody what happens? does any radiation energy heat up the black body?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
philrainey said:
if a wave of light intermingles with another the same but of opposite phrase I believe you get what is called black light.

No. Black light is merely a common name for ultraviolet light.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_light

Ultraviolet light is simply shorter wavelength than violet light. Humans can't see it, though some other creatures (such as bees) can.
 
Oh I had this hairy fairy idea (thinking of light as waves) That two waves of opposite phrase traveling in the same vector kind of canceled each other out. Maybe like add to zero. I thought as the universe is suppose to add to zero if the opposite of something is added to something then that something would return to zero. Then I went on with my notion and thought maybe that could be reversiable and one could in theory create light energy from nothing. Never mind.
 
philrainey wrote in:
#1:
if a wave of light intermingles with another the same but of opposite phrase I believe you get what is called black light. If the black light hits a blackbody what happens? does any radiation energy heat up the black body?
#3:
Oh I had this hairy fairy idea (thinking of light as waves) That two waves of opposite phrase traveling in the same vector kind of canceled each other out. Maybe like add to zero. I thought as the universe is suppose to add to zero if the opposite of something is added to something then that something would return to zero. Then I went on with my notion and thought maybe that could be reversiable and one could in theory create light energy from nothing. Never mind.
philrainey - please carefully consider which sectioin in PF your queries truly belong. Both this one and previous one 'Bending radiation' are not really QM but more of a classical/general physics nature.

Wave interference is real enough but is believed to always obey total conservation of energy. Some examples are the light and dark interference fringes seen in double-slit experiments (classical optics or QM), or scattering of waves at waveguide junctions and obstacles, see e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interference_(wave_propagation). The basic idea is such scattering/interference is 'unitary' - net input = net output. Which means cancellation in some regions is accompanied by reinforcement elsewhere and/or at other times ('beat' phenomena). One doesn't think of wave interference in terms of individual field quanta (photons) cancelling each other, but is really a collective phenomenon that emerges from the summed behaviour of many individual quanta.
 
Last edited:
for years I thought black light was light waves that canceled each other out, I really got it wrong. I think somebody at college told me that and I have believed it ever since. Well we have sorted that false notion out.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top