What does Griffith mean by this hint? [Electrodynamics]

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem from Griffith's 'Introduction to Electrodynamics' regarding conductivity and charge density in a resistive medium. The poster understands that varying conductivity leads to a non-zero divergence of current density but struggles with the implications of non-zero charge density. Participants suggest using the constitutive equation for current density and the continuity equation to clarify the relationship between these variables. There's also a query about the notation used, specifically whether 's' refers to the radial coordinate in cylindrical coordinates. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these concepts for solving related problems in electrodynamics.
Mind----Blown
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I was solving the problems given by Griffith in his book 'Introduction to Electrodynamics' and stumbled across this question.
Screenshot_3.png
Screenshot_12.png

Screenshot_1.png

"Because sigma (conductivity of the medium) is a function of position, the equation 7.5 does not hold" --i get this point; current density isn't constant and so its divergence will be non zero.
"The charge density is non zero in the resistive medium"-- I have no clue what this sentence means.. I can't even think why i don't find it right.. someone please explain it to me!

Thanks a lot !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Another hint: Use the constitutive equation
$$\vec{j}=\sigma \vec{E}$$
and the continuity equation for stationary currents
$$\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{j}=0,$$
which together immediately tell you, how to modify Eq. (7.5). Also it would be helpful to tell, what ##s## is. Is it the cylinder coordinate ##r## in standard notation? I guess so from the Figure, which indicates that ##\vec{E}## is radially out.

PS: Questions like this should be posted in the homework forum!
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top