What does it mean to have a charge?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TheRingBarer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Mean
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of electric charge, specifically its nature and implications in physics. Participants highlight that charge is a fundamental property of objects, akin to mass and volume, and is best understood through its interactions with other properties. The conversation also touches on the derivation of Maxwell's equations and the speculative nature of theories like string theory, emphasizing that the inquiry into "why" charge exists is less productive than understanding "what" charge is and how it interacts with other phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as electric charge and electrostatics.
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations and their significance in electromagnetism.
  • Knowledge of fundamental particles, including electrons and their interactions.
  • Awareness of theoretical physics concepts like string theory and dimensions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of Maxwell's equations in electromagnetic theory.
  • Study the interactions of fundamental particles, focusing on electron behavior and electrostatic forces.
  • Investigate the principles of string theory and its relation to charge and dimensions.
  • Research the philosophical implications of "why" questions in scientific inquiry.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of electric charge and its role in the universe.

TheRingBarer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I understand where is comes from and its effects on other things that have an electrostatic charge, but what does it mean to have a charge? Why do electrons repel other -ve (sub) atomic particles? It's really not something I find tangible. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It's just a property of objects, as are mass, volume, and so on. It's just a little more ... hard to imagine than those.

If I remember correctly, we can derive Maxwell's equations from assuming another spatial dimension and taking charge to be the component of momentum in that dimension or something of the sort, but I think for now that's considered in the realm of other non-provable (or, rather, non-disprovable) theories such as string theory.
 


In the end, the best we can do with all basic properties is to define them by their interactions with other basic properties. "Why" is not a useful question, particularly not in physics. Usually when somebody asks "Why" in a science context the phenomenon is then described in terms of more basic phenomenon. Ex - Why is the sky blue? Because of refraction. Thats is fine, but continue that line of questioning and you will eventually hit a wall when you reach basic phenomenon. Once you get to basic phenomenon "Why" no longer makes sense to ask and "What" is the better way to ask the question.

If/when we do have an answer to "Why charge?" then that would imply we have more basic phenomena to appeal too. Basic phenomena which would in turn resist any question of "Why?".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
971
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K