B What Does Skew Symmetry Imply for One-Dimensional Systems?

hoddy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
if I have a equation like (just a random eq.) p_dot = S(omega)*p. where p = [x, y, z] is the original states, omega = [p, q, r] and S - skew symmetric. How does the equation appear if i only want a system to have the state z?
Hi,

if I have a equation like (just a random eq.) p_dot = S(omega)*p. where p = [x, y, z] is the original states, omega = [p, q, r] and S - skew symmetric.
How does the equation appear if i only want a system to have the state z? do I get z_dot = -q*x + p*y. Or is the symmetric not valid so I simply get z_dot = z? or something else?
and the same for rotation matrix? : p_dot = R(omega)*p

Thanks for any replies!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hoddy said:
(just a random eq.)
You are asking us to decode a random equation that you made up?

And it would help if you would please learn to post math equations using LaTeX. That would make your postings a lot more clear (well, maybe not if you keep posting random equations...).

The PF LaTeX tutorial is available in the Help pages, under INFO at the top of the page.
 
Hi berkeman. sorry, here is the complete equation with v, omega, f and g beeing 3x1 vectors:
awd.PNG


Im just curious about the first term with the skew symmetric, how it will turn out when I only have it in 1 dimension, like described in original post.
 
What should skew symmetry mean in one dimension? S=0? I suspect from your question that we speak about quantum physics, and the three dimensional skew symmetric matrices form a semisimple Lie algebra. It's no longer semisimple in the one dimensional case which is crucial, skew symmetric or not, hence irrelevant in the context you hinted at.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top