What does T represent in mc^2 equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZedCar
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the equation T = mc² - m₀c², participants explore the meaning of T, questioning if it represents kinetic energy. Some mention that T is commonly used for kinetic energy in Classical Mechanics, while others note that K is typically used instead. The conversation highlights variations in notation across different textbooks, with some using U for potential energy. There is confusion regarding the use of T, with suggestions that it might be a misprint. Ultimately, the discussion underscores the inconsistency in terminology within physics literature.
ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1
I have an equation which states;

T = mc^2 - m0c^2

I know kinetic energy equals this same equation. Does T also represent kinetic energy in this equation? If so, why has the letter T been used?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some books use T for kinetic and U for potential energy, whereas other books use different conventions.
 
Is there any particular reason for the letter T?

Does it represent translational kinetic energy?
 
Kinetic energy is E = ½mv² and may be called by other letters, but E = mc² could only be Einstein's formula for the energy obtained from converting mass m into energy in some kind of nuclear reaction. Here c is the speed of light. I have never seen it called T. Sounds like a misprint.
 
ZedCar said:
I have an equation which states;

T = mc^2 - m0c^2

I know kinetic energy equals this same equation. Does T also represent kinetic energy in this equation? If so, why has the letter T been used?

Thanks
It's very common for Classical Mechanics textbooks to use the upper case letter T for kinetic energy.
 
SammyS said:
It's very common for Classical Mechanics textbooks to use the upper case letter T for kinetic energy.

Well that's new ... I've normally have seen K for that

But again i haven't read too many books
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top