I What does the 0-ket in this state function expression represent?

davidge
Messages
553
Reaction score
21
I would like to know what the "0-ket", called vacuum state and used in the following expression, represents $$\Psi(x,t) = \int d^3x <x| \ a^{\dagger}(x) \ |0>$$ I have rewritten the expression for the case of just one ##x##. The expression above is usually presented with ##(x_1,...x_n)## (n particles), in which case we have to integrate over each ##x_i##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
davidge said:
the following expression

Where are you getting this expression from? It doesn't look right, since there is a dependence on ##t## on the LHS but nothing on the RHS has anything to do with ##t##.
 
  • Like
Likes davidge
PeterDonis said:
Where are you getting this expression from? It doesn't look right, since there is a dependence on ##t## on the LHS but nothing on the RHS has anything to do with ##t##.
Sorry, it was a typo. The expression as I saw it, is find below. I have it in my QM-folder. As I got it long time ago, I will not be able to tell you where I got it from.
9RLveJa.png
 
davidge said:
As I got it long time ago, I will not be able to tell you where I got it from.

Sorry, without a valid reference, I have no way of responding, except to say that what's in your QM folder still doesn't look quite right (nor does it look the same, for the case of one dimension, as what you wrote in the OP). This is why we ask for references to textbooks and peer-reviewed papers directly, not something you might have gotten from it at some time but can't remember, and apparently miscopied something when you wrote it down.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes davidge
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top