What Does the Radiowave Absorption Formula in the Ionosphere Mean?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding a formula related to collisional radiowave absorption in the ionosphere, which is unfamiliar to the original poster. Key terms in the formula, such as Ar, Au, e, and s, are questioned for their meanings, with suggestions that e represents the electron charge and s may denote distance traveled by the wave. References to articles on microwave radiation absorption provide context, indicating that parameters like collision rate and electron number density are relevant. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on how to convert the formula into an absorption rate. Overall, the participants aim to decode the formula for an upcoming experiment.
kd001
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
For an upcoming experiment I was given the following formula to study


It shows the collisional radiowave absorption in the ionosphere although I don't really understand what it means. I have not come across it before and its not in my textbook. Can someone familiar with it please explain to me what this formula is actually doing and what each of the terms mean. Also, is there a way of converting it into absorption rate?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • formula.jpg
    formula.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 449
Physics news on Phys.org
I need to get started on this pretty soon. At the very least does anyone know what Ar and Au might stand for? Is 'e' the exponential or does it stand for something else in this case? Is is 's' in the term 'ds' the distance? If so the distance of what? The distance the wave has travelled?

Thanks a lot.
 
Last edited:
I would expect e to be the electron charge, and m_e to be its mass.

I found an article about microwave radiation absorption in the ionosphere:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/72661h65211018t0/

Some of the parameters were similar, so maybe they are the same. The \nu was a collision rate, and N was n electron number density so that could be your N_e. They considered a vertical trajectory, so your integral could be an onedimensional integral along a vertical path.

f may be the frequency of the incoming radiation. It is in this article:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VSV-4DS3T3S-12/2/ad63762fcb25ea6d6e194ca1563f0659
They also used \nu as the electron collision frequency, and elecron number density N_e. Also electron charge e, electron mass m, and speed of light c, electric permittivity \epsilon_0 as in your formula.

Torquil
 
Thanks. That helps.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top