B What Does the Unit m-3/2 Mean in the Hall Petch Equation?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter richard9678
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units
richard9678
Messages
93
Reaction score
7
Hi. Stress is measured on Pascals. It's force divided by area. Area of course is m x m. So when stress is given it's in units of MN / m2 or MN m-2.

Okay. I'm looking at something called the Hall Petch equation. There a constant in it labelled k.

In an example, k is given as 0.45 MN m-3/2

Does this make any sense or is there an error with the description of k?

I mean, what is m-3/2? Thanks.

P.S. Possible that there is an error in the text. And that k is MN m1/2. However, if it is, I still don't know what m is as a unit. In other words I know m2 is - square meters.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The Hall-Petch equation asserts a relation of the form <br /> (\mathrm{stress}) = \frac{(\mathrm{coefficient})}{(\mathrm{length})^x} or <br /> (\mathrm{coefficient}) = (\mathrm{stress})(\mathrm{length})^x. It follows that in SI units the coefficient is measured in units of \mathrm{Pa}\,\mathrm{m}^x or \mathrm{N}\,\mathrm{m}^{x-2}. x need not be an integer.
 
richard9678 said:
Hi. Stress is measured on Pascals. It's force divided by area. Area of course is m x m. So when stress is given it's in units of MN / m2 or MN m-2.

Okay. I'm looking at something called the Hall Petch equation. There a constant in it labelled k.

In an example, k is given as 0.45 MN m-3/2

Does this make any sense or is there an error with the description of k?

I mean, what is m-3/2? Thanks.

P.S. Possible that there is an error in the text. And that k is MN m1/2. However, if it is, I still don't know what m is as a unit. In other words I know m2 is - square meters.
In fracture mechanics, the stress intensity factor for different types of flaws is expressed in units of MPa-m1/2.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fracture_mechanics
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top