What Does x=--x Mean in Mathematics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sinas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Mystery
AI Thread Summary
The equation x = --x illustrates that the double negation of a variable returns the variable itself, confirming that x is equal to its own negation twice. This is supported by the properties of multiplication and the definition of the additive inverse, where adding a number to its negative results in zero. The discussion explains that -1 multiplied by -1 equals 1, reinforcing the concept of double negation in mathematics. Additionally, it highlights that the additive inverse of the additive inverse of x is x itself. Overall, the equation emphasizes fundamental properties of numbers in algebra.
sinas
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
x=--x

wtf =/

(this isn't a homework problem but it was brought up today and I'm curious) :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sinas said:
x=--x

wtf =/

(this isn't a homework problem but it was brought up today and I'm curious) :confused:

Well, what do you start with?
If you start with
-1 \times -1 = 1
then
--x = -1(-1(x))=(-1 \times -1) x= 1 x =x
The first equality is by definition, the second because multiplication is associative, the third because you know -1 \times -1 =1 [/tex] and the last because 1 is the multiplicative identity.<br /> <br /> To see that -1 \times -1 =1:<br /> \frac{-1}{-1}=1=\frac{1}{1}<br /> so<br /> \frac{-1}{1}=\frac{1}{-1}<br /> but<br /> 1=\frac{-1}{-1}=-1 \times \frac{1}{-1}=-1 \times -1
 
It's a bit easier than that.
By definition of zero, x+0=x
By definition of the additive inverse,
x+(-x)=0

--x, that is, (-(-x))
fulfills therefore:
(-x)+(-(-x)=0
Add x on both sides:
x+(-x)+(-(-x))=x, or, since x+(-x)=0, we get:
(-(-x))=x

That is the additive inverse to the additive inverse of x is x itself.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top