What Equation Should I Use for Calculating Total Impedance in RLC Circuits?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate total impedance in RLC circuits, two main equations are discussed: one for parallel complex impedances and another for the magnitude of impedance in parallel resistor-capacitor-inductor setups. The first equation is used for combining complex impedances, while the second is applicable for calculating the magnitude of impedance when components are connected in parallel. It is essential to first determine the individual complex impedances before applying the first equation to find the total impedance. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of using complex numbers for accurate calculations in these scenarios. Understanding the context and application of these equations is crucial for solving advanced RLC circuit problems.
Mrhu
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello again!

We have been given a couple of more advanced problems where the components are placed in series parallely.

Check the image, the question is regarding what equation to use, in order to calculate the total impedance of the circuit.

Homework Equations


I have stumbled upon the following equations...
Z_{tot}=\frac{1}{\frac{1}{Z_{1}}+\frac{1}{Z_{2}}}

And the same equation, only squared and partly modified

Z_{tot}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{(\frac{1}{R})^{2}+(\frac{1}{X_{L}}-\frac{1}{X_{C}})^{2}}}



The Attempt at a Solution



If you take a look at the image you will see two examples, my theory is that the second equation is valid for the first example.

But when does one use the first equation? And can the second equation be used on the second example, and vice versa?

Many thanks in advance, please do use real numbers when explaining. I am aware of the importance of complex numbers in RLC circuits we have not applied them in Physics yet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first equation refers to the complex resultant impedance Z if two complex impedances, Z1 and Z2 are connected in parallel. The second one shows the magnitude Z of the resultant impedance of parallel connected resistor, capacitor and inductor. The identical notation is confusing.



ehild
 
ehild said:
The first equation refers to the complex resultant impedance Z if two complex impedances, Z1 and Z2 are connected in parallel. The second one shows the magnitude Z of the resultant impedance of parallel connected resistor, capacitor and inductor. The identical notation is confusing.



ehild

Thank you for the quick reply.

Yes, it is a bit confusing.

If you look at the picture (example 2), should I first calculate the part-impedances, then add them using the first equation in order to achieve the total impedance?

Thanks ehild
 

Attachments

  • qKfUf.png
    qKfUf.png
    18.8 KB · Views: 536
Last edited:
You can not solve example 2 without using complex impedances. Yes, you need to calculate the complex Z1 and Z2 separately, then add them as complex numbers, according to the first equation.

\hat Z_1=R+iX_L

\hat Z_2=i(X_L-X_C)

The reciprocal impedances add up:

\frac{1}{\hat Z}=\frac{1}{\hat Z_1}+\frac{1}{\hat Z_2}

You get the magnitude by multiplying by the complex conjugate and then take the square root.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top