What equation to use for projectile motion problems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding two projectile motion equations that use similar variables but yield different results. The first equation, which relates final and initial velocities over time, was correctly applied to determine the time of flight for a marble rolling off a table. The second equation, which should use the change in vertical position (Δy) instead of time (Δt), was incorrectly utilized, leading to an inaccurate final velocity calculation. Participants clarified that the correct application of the first equation aligns with the textbook's approach, while the second equation's misprint could cause confusion. Understanding the proper context for each equation is crucial for solving projectile motion problems accurately.
pickle37
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was given a list of equations for projectile motion and two of the equations have the same variables but give different outputs. I don't understand when to use one equation and when to use the other. The equations are:

ay=(vfy-viy)/(delta t)

and

(vfy)^2= (viy)^2 + 2ay(delta t)

I tried using the second equation to solve the following problem but got it wrong. In the book they used the first equation. I see how using the first equation makes sense now, but why is it wrong to use the second equation?

A marble rolls off a table at the horizontal velocity of 1.93 m/s. The tabletop is 76.5 cm above the floor. If air resistance is negligible, determine the velocity at impact.

I solved for (delta t) and got 0.4s. I rearranged the second equation to find (vfy) and tried to solve using (viy)=0m/s, ay= 9.8 m/s^2, and (delta t)= 0.4s . I found (vfy) to be 2.8 m/s when its supposed to be 3.9 m/s
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Recheck your second equation. Are you sure 'delta t' isn't 'delta y'?
 
They have (delta t) written in the textbook
 
Everything looks good except I think your second equation isn't quite right. 0.4s is correct. What textbook is this?
 
The second equation should definitely have \Delta y instead of \Delta t. If your book has \Delta y there, it's a misprint.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top