What force is lifting the weight on the bottom wire and how was it created?

Random Variable
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
There are two long horizontal wires. The currents in both wires are traveling in the same direction. The current in the top wire is much larger than the current in the bottom wire. A weight is suspended from the bottom wire. Since magnetic forces can't do work, what force is doing work on the weight to lift it upwards? It's probably an electric force, but how was it generated? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right, since magnetic forces can't do work, it's an electric force. The electric force is from the fact that the electrons (free charges in the current) in the bottom wire are constrained to be in the wire!

For example, imagine you have a stream of electrons NOT confined to a wire. Then you switch on a constant external magnetic field. All of the electrons will then travel in a circle.

They are NOT allowed to do this in a wire! As a somewhat crude model, you can think of the electrons in the wire curving upward and "hitting" the "wall" of the wire, and the collision raises the wire up a tiny bit (while repelling the electrons down). The magnetic field tells the electrons to curve upward again, and the process is repeated. So, it's the electric force between the electrons in the wire and the rest of the wire that is responsible for the wire rising up.
 
The work is being done by the battery, or generator.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top