What Force Lifts the Bicycle Wheel Off the Ground?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Center
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force required to lift a bicycle wheel off the ground when resting against a step. The initial calculation provided was 71 N, based on torque equations, but it was suggested that the distances used for torque calculations were incorrect. A more detailed analysis involving resolving forces into perpendicular components was introduced, leading to a revised force of approximately 29.79 N. The importance of considering angles in the torque calculations was emphasized, indicating that the initial approach may have oversimplified the problem. The final confirmation of the calculations is pending feedback from a teacher.
physics10
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Please help this is due by Monday at 8:00am Eastern time. I don't know if I am did this problem correctly, please help.

Here is the question:

A bicycle is resting against a small step whose height is h=0.120m. The weight and radius of the wheel are W= 25.0 N, and r=0.340m. A horizontal force F is applied to the axle of the wheel. As the magnitude of F increases, there comes a time when the wheel just begins to rise up and loses contact with the ground. What is the magnitude of the force when this happens?

This is what I did:

torque=-F*(0.120m)+W(0.340m)=0
=-F(0.120m)+(25.0 N)*(0.340)=0
F=(25.0 N)*(0.340m)/(0.120m)=70.83= F=71 N

Please tell me if this is correct or not before Monday, I am a new member to this site so please bear with me--Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, when you chose the axis of rotation, you got the wrong distances.
 
Resolve the vectors to perpindicular

From yours:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is what I did:

torque=-F*(0.120m)+W(0.340m)=0
=-F(0.120m)+(25.0 N)*(0.340)=0
F=(25.0 N)*(0.340m)/(0.120m)=70.83= F=71 N
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

BE SURE TO VERIFY THIS, ITS BEEN A WHILE!

I believe you have to resolve the two forces acting in this equilibreum to the perpindicular and parallel vectors. The perp vectors act to give torque, the parallell ones do nothing at all on the equilibreum.

the dist from step up to center is .220m

Using trig: sin(@) =.220/.340
@=40.32 degrees (below the 0 degree plane) (I'll use 40 degrees)

Get the perpindicular component of the 25 N force: Lay out the triangle on paper and find all the angles:
cos 40 = perp force/25 N
perp force = 19.15 N

Get the relationship for the perp component for the applied force:
cos 50 = perp component force/force applied horizontally.

As you pointed out, the two perpindicular forces resolved from (one from the wheel weight down, one from the applied force horiz) must equal 0 for equilibreum, same ccw and cw torque. so: that means that the perp force component must equal 19.15 N for the applied force, since this is what the other is. SO:

cos 50 = perp component force/force applied horizontally.

F applied horiz x cos50 =19.15
F applied horiz = 29.79 N <ans



Let me know what you think. Again its been awhile, this seems like a small number to me. I am sure though that you can not just use the vectors given and sum the torques to 0 without considering the angles.
 
yes, that's what i got.
 
Thanks-

Thanks for your help, I'll check it with my teacher on Monday and let you know.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top