What Frequency Appears as 1 Hz When Sampled at 0.2 Seconds Due to Aliasing?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the next higher frequency that appears as a 1 Hz wave when sampled at 0.2 seconds (5 Hz sampling frequency), it is essential to consider the Nyquist theorem, which states that the sampling frequency must be at least twice the frequency being sampled. Sampling a 1 Hz signal at this rate is feasible, but it results in a coarse representation. However, attempting to sample higher frequencies like 4 Hz or 11 Hz at the same rate leads to aliasing, making them indistinguishable. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proper sampling rates to avoid confusion in digital signal representation. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate signal analysis and interpretation.
kakolukia786
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi. I have been given a plot for 1 Hz, sampled at 0.2 sec. And, 4 Hz and 11 Hz has also been plotted. So, from the plot, I can see that its really hard to distinguish between the signals after digitalization. My question is how do I find the next higher frequency which, when sampled at 0.2 secs, will look like a 1 Hz wave ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
kakolukia786 said:
Hi. I have been given a plot for 1 Hz, sampled at 0.2 sec. And, 4 Hz and 11 Hz has also been plotted. So, from the plot, I can see that its really hard to distinguish between the signals after digitalization. My question is how do I find the next higher frequency which, when sampled at 0.2 secs, will look like a 1 Hz wave ?
Do you mean 0.2s duration of sampling (with a given sampling frequency), or do you mean one sample every 0.2s (5Hz sampling frequency)?

Vidar
 
I mean one sample every 0.2 seconds
 
kakolukia786 said:
I mean one sample every 0.2 seconds

In general you need at least two samples per cycle. You have a sampling frequency of 5Hz. Sampling 1Hz with this is not a problem - however very coarse plot. Using the same sampling frequency when you have 4 and 11Hz input would not provide any results at all.
According to Nyquist theorem, the minimum sampling frequency is twice the frequency you are trying to sample. Below you see a link to a PDF explaining this.

http://redwood.berkeley.edu/bruno/npb261/aliasing.pdf


Vidar
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top