Admissions What Graduate Programs Should I Apply to?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on selecting physics graduate programs, with the original poster expressing concern over their PGRE score of 730, which is lower than expected. They seek advice on adjusting their application list to include a mix of reach, safety, and backup schools, while also considering their strong GPA of 3.8 and limited research experience. Participants recommend adding lower-tier schools and utilizing resources like Physicsgre.com to gauge acceptance trends based on PGRE scores. They emphasize the importance of strong letters of recommendation and undergraduate research, noting that faculty support can significantly impact admissions chances. Ultimately, the consensus encourages aiming high while diversifying the application list.
jilliwilli
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am looking for advice on what physics graduate programs to apply to. My original list was:

University of Maryland - College Park
Harvard University
Columbia University
Caltech
Pennsylvania State
University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign
Colorado University - Boulder
UC-Barbara
niversity of Texas - Austin
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Ohio State University
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
Note: I aware this is a large number of schools, but am really serious about getting in somewhere.

My PGRE score has just arrived: 730 :( . Much lower than expected. I need to revise the above list but wonder what are some decent safety schools and "reach" schools given a 730 PGRE. I would like to apply to roughly 4 reach, 5 safety, 3 backup.
Some other details: my GPA is 3.8/4.0, and I have done research during 1 summer REU and 1 summer at my school. I want to go into Condensed Matter or AMO.
Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it wouldn't hurt to add some more lower-tier schools to that list, especially given that you have I would say below-average research experience. If you want to see where people of a similar caliber apply, maybe check out the Physicsgre.com applicant profiles (http://www.physicsgre.com/viewtopic.php?t=6128).
 
jilliwilli,
I agree that you should add some more lower-tier schools. The link that Dishsoap provided is a great resource. Also if you have the time, you may find this thread helpful: http://www.physicsgre.com/viewtopic.php?t=3669, which summarizes acceptances by PGRE score. This will you a rough idea of PRGE ranges for top-tier, mid-tier and low-tier programs. Cheers!
 
I think Rutgers would be a good school to add.
 
A lot will depend on the reputation of your undergrad school, letters of recommendation, publications, and physics coursework.

Faculty at your school, especially those writing your recommendation letters, are the best qualified to give you advice, because they understand the reputation of your school in this context, and they know a lot more about what is in those recommendation letters.

Undergrad research that leads to publications tends to be much more impressive than research that does not.

I went from LSU undergrad to MIT grad based on paper qualifications not much stronger than your original post (70th ish percentile on PGRE). But I was the "golden boy" of the Physics Dept - the best undergrad they'd seen in 5-10 years, and several faculty worked hard to pave the way for me - multiple publications, great rec letters, etc. I got full ride offers to MIT, Stanford, and Princeton. You need to find out what your faculty are willing to do for you.

They told me not to worry about the PGRE score, to shoot for the stars.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
63
Views
8K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top