What groups have exactly 4 subgroups?

Mystic998
Messages
203
Reaction score
0
I was wondering about the classification of groups with a certain number of subgroups. I (sort of mostly I think maybe) get the ideas behind classification of groups of a certain (hopefully small) order, but I came across a question about classifying all groups with exactly 4 subgroups, and I have no clue whatsoever how to even begin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, any (nontrivial) group has at least two subgroups: itself and the subgroup consisting of only the identity. Moreover, a subgroup of a subgroup is a subgroup of the original group. Another thing you might find helpful is Cauchy's theorem.
 
sylow's theorem says there is a subgroup of order p^k whenever p is prime and p^k divides the order of the group. so groups of order pq seem to satisfy the condition. where p and q are prime. but there canniot be more than two factors of the order of the group, and there cannot be a factor occurring to a power higher than 2? or could a group of order p^3 possibly work? seems unlikely...
 
Yeah, I think groups of order pq work. Also, I think a cyclic group of order p^3 works...
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
12K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
18K
Back
Top