B What Happens to a Cube When 99% of Its Mass Disappears?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter martix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Physics
AI Thread Summary
When 99% of a cube's mass disappears, the equilibrium is disrupted, causing the cube to experience a sudden loss of downward force. This results in an upward force that could theoretically propel it upward, similar to a spring effect, depending on the material's properties. If the cube and surface are non-deformable, the upward force would also vanish, leaving the remaining mass to rest on the surface without any movement. The discussion highlights the complexities of force dynamics when mass is rapidly removed from an object. Ultimately, the scenario raises intriguing questions about the laws of physics and their implications in hypothetical situations.
martix
Messages
167
Reaction score
5
First of all I apologize if silly speculative discussions like this don't belong here. With that disclaimer out of the way, here's a fun thought experiment:

Let's say an object, a cube that weighs 1kg rests on a rigid, level surface. And all of a sudden 99% of its mass disappears.
What happens?
Well, my thinking is, the cube is in equilibrium, so an equal amount of up and down force acts on it. Then 99% of the down force disappears in an instant and the cube is shot up, as if it had just bounced off.
Is that anywhere near reasonable?
What would the upwards force be? 0.99*9.8 Newtons? How far up would it go?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"What do the laws of physics predict if we violate the laws?"
Why would the force upwards not disappear in the same moment?

To find some physical situation: if you split the block horizontally in two parts and rapidly remove the upper part, the lower block expands a bit (because pressure from above reduces), which can in theory let it jump up a bit like a spring. Won't lead to an actual jump with most materials, but with rubber and similar things it should be possible. The achievable height depends on material parameters and the way the block is split.
 
:) That's why I said silly.
Oh... that does indeed seem similar mechanically.
Sadly my physical intuition fails me here, that's why I was asking.

Am I correct in interpreting your point as, if the object(and ground) are non-deformable(i.e. not springy), nothing would happen to the lower piece?
 
The only reason a surface pushes up on an object resting on it is that the object, through gravitation force, presses down on the object. If part or all of the mass disappears, the downward force and, therefore the upward force, also disappears. It would be exactly the same as if the smaller portion that is left, alone, were sitting on the surface.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top