What Happens to Accreting Brown Dwarfs in the Galaxy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter qraal
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Accreting brown dwarfs, when cooled to near ambient temperatures, can gain mass through gravitational attraction, potentially altering their orbits as they interact with the interstellar medium. These objects may spiral inward toward the galaxy's core or be ejected through interactions with other stars. There is a possibility that they could collide with other celestial bodies, leading to the formation of new stars or igniting as low-mass stars if they reach sufficient mass. Stellar collisions are extremely rare, occurring approximately once every 100 billion years, while most brown dwarfs may eventually contribute to the central black hole of the galaxy. The discussion raises intriguing questions about the potential for intelligent life to harness energy from black holes in the distant future.
qraal
Messages
787
Reaction score
3
Hi All

A puzzle of the very distant future. Imagine a brown dwarf, about 0.02 solar masses and 0.1 solar radii. It's moving through the galaxy and has cooled to near ambient so it can accrete mass via its gravity, almost like a giant ramscoop. As it gains mass what does that do to its orbit? It experiences the ISM as a headwind of 15 km/s, thus accreting from about 390 times its frontal area. I'm guessing the brown dwarf would slowly spiral inwards towards the core, unless it is involved in a scattering interaction with another star and is flung out of the galaxy. Alternatively it could collide with another brown dwarf or white dwarf and briefly (on this timescale that is) form a new star. I'm wondering if it might accrete enough mass to eventually ignite as a low mass star by itself or would pycnonuclear reactions transform it into helium before then? Or would it end up in the central black hole? Brown dwarfs close to the ignition mass might do so before the other possibilities claim them. The characteristic time of stellar collisions is ~1022 years and scattering will undo the galaxy in 1019-1020.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A brown dwarf could accrete enough mass to spontaneously ignite under its own gravity. This could take a very long time given the low average density of the interstallar medium. Stellar collisions are, however, extraordinarily rare events.
 
Chronos said:
A brown dwarf could accrete enough mass to spontaneously ignite under its own gravity. This could take a very long time given the low average density of the interstallar medium. Stellar collisions are, however, extraordinarily rare events.

Collisions are rare. That's why their characteristic time is ~1022 years, thus in a galaxy of 100 billion stars they happen ~1 every 100 billion years. But over 1022 years it happens with a certain inevitability. However the Galaxy is likely to relax long before then in ~1019-1020 years. About 90% escapes and 10% end up adding to the central Black Hole.

Did you see how M87's CBH is now estimated at a mass of 6.4 billion solars! That means it's 18.9 billion kilometres in radius and a radially infalling mass would reach the central singularity in ~27.5 hours after crossing the event horizon! If 10% of the Milky Way disk ends up in the CBH then it'll mass about the same... what a monster accretion disk it'll form.

I do wonder what intelligent life could do with such monsters. Feeding a black hole extracts ~5.7% of the rest mass of the infalling material as energy - could intelligent life, living in the wreck of the Milkomeda Galaxy use the CBH as their Last Redoubt against the cosmic night?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top