What Happens to Double Slit Diffraction in a Ripple Tank?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about double slit diffraction in a ripple tank, participants evaluate statements regarding the effects of changing wave frequency and slit distance on fringe angles. The consensus on the answers includes a mix of true and false responses, with some participants suggesting that a detailed explanation for each answer would enhance understanding. A key point raised is the importance of the correct equation, dsin(theta) = velocity / frequency, although it was noted that phase velocity is not addressed by this equation. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in the reasoning behind the answers provided. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of wave behavior in diffraction scenarios.
Arget
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

  1. Consider diffraction in a ripple tank from two narrow slits. Answer true (T) or false (F) for each of the following statements. E.g., if the first statement is true and the rest false, enter TFFF. You have 6 tries.
    1. If the frequency of the wave source is halved, then the angle between the zeroth and first order fringes is doubled.
    2. If the frequency of the source and the space between the slits are both halved, then the angle between the zeroth and first order fringes stays the same.
    3. If the frequency of the wave source is doubled, then the phase speed of the waves doubles.
    4. If the distance between the slits is doubled, then the angle between the zeroth and first order fringes is doubled.
The attempt at a solution

TFTT
FFTT
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you get those answers?
 
mfb said:
How did you get those answers?
I used the equation dsin(theta) = velocity / frequency
 
As some of your answers are incorrect, a description for every answer could be useful.

The phase velocity is not covered by that equation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
783
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
13K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Back
Top