What Happens to Light When a Flashlight Hits an Asteroid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter keepitmoving
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroid Light
keepitmoving
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
if a flashlight is moving at half the speed of light and sending out light at a relative speed of c and then the flashlight runs into an asteroid and wham, it stops moving relative to the asteroid, does the light that has already been sent out put on its retro rockets so that is can resume its speed at c relative to the smashed flashlight?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is the theory of relativity, time changes not velocity.
 
Light leaves the flashlight traveling at c, and it travels at c with respect to both the flashlight and asteroid. The main difference is measuring while traveling with the flashlight you would get one frequency and measuring with the asteroid you would get another higher frequency. This is called the relativistic Doppler shift.
 
keepitmoving said:
if a flashlight is moving at half the speed of light and sending out light at a relative speed of c and then the flashlight runs into an asteroid and wham, it stops moving relative to the asteroid, does the light that has already been sent out put on its retro rockets so that is can resume its speed at c relative to the smashed flashlight?

The main premise of relativity is that all obsevers measure light to be traveling at c no matter what their speed is relative to another observer. This doesn't change if an observer's speed changes. Phrases like the ones above will cause you confusion.
 
You have not grasped the idea that the speed of light is universal. This is VERY important to understanding relativity.

Simply put, light moves at c from all reference points. It does not matter if the flashlight was moving at .5c or .999999c or .0000000001c, light moves at c at all costs.

If you were racing with a beam of light, and you moved at .9999c, you would say that light is moving .0001 c faster than you right? Wrong. It is moving at c relative to you. You would wonder how is it possible that its moving at c relative to you even tho u are moving at .9999c...well that is because space and time change in order for light to remain at c from ANY reference point.
 
i always wondered about the possibility of intervening events as far as conflicting observations.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top