What Happens to Op-Amp Gain When Switch is On?

AI Thread Summary
In a non-inverting Op-Amp circuit, the gain is initially calculated as A = 1 + (R1 + R2)/R3 when the switch is off. When the switch is turned on, it shorts R2, leading to a new gain of A = 1 + (R1)/R3. The discussion highlights the importance of proper circuit diagram conventions, such as using junction points to indicate connections. The circuit's functionality is compromised when the switch is open due to a lack of negative feedback. Overall, understanding the impact of the switch on gain and adhering to schematic conventions is crucial for accurate circuit design.
foobag
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/8362/opamp2.png

Lets say we are given a non-inverting Op-Amp

The gain of this circuit would be A = 1 + (R1+R2)/R3 if the switch is off.

What happens when the switch is turned on? It shorts the R1 and R2 resistors am I correct? Does this mean that R1 and R2 will behave as if they are in parallel, and decrease the overall gain of this amplifier?

Appreciate your help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
As you have drawn it, only R2 is shorted.

So, the gain is A = 1 + (R1)/R3.
 
ah ok, thank you for your help!
 
As the circuit is drawn it doesn't work (in any sensible way) when the switch is open as there is no negative feedback.

Where two wires cross on a circuit diagram you MUST place a "junction point" (filled in dot) if the two wires are connected at that point. Otherwise there is NO connection. This is the standard convention.
 
Another convention is to draw a hump where there is a crossover that doesn't touch.

Yet another is draw a broken line where it passes under another wire.

All three methods are used but I like the solid circle method as it is unambiguous.

In this case, there is apparently a connection at each side of the resistor with the switch across it.
 
Last edited:
vk6kro said:
Another convention is to draw a hump where there is a crossover that doesn't touch.
Yeah but that is somewhat outdated now. The most common convention (which is used almost universally in circuits and schematic software) is the use of the junction point "dot".

btw UART, where are you in oz? Up very late unless you are in WA?
Yeah I'm just up late.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top