What Happens to the Electric Field Equation at Different Limits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vorcil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Limits
vorcil
Messages
395
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi, I need to figure out what happens to this equation in the limits

E = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{2\lambda L}{z \sqrt{z^2+L^2}}

in the two different cases

that z>>L

and when L -> infinity

(note this equation was derived from finding the electric field da distance z, above the midpoint of a straight line segment of length 2L, which carries a uniform line charge of \lambda



The Attempt at a Solution



for the case when, z>>L I can see how the L term becomes insignificant in the square root on the bottom,
and so the equation would just become
\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{2\lambda L}{z^2}

but for the case when L approaches infinity, what do I do?
the squareroot of a L^2 +z^2 == L?
does that mean the L can just be canceled out?
\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{2\lambda L}{z *L}
and the equation becomes?
\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{2\lambda}{z}

i'm not sure if I'm allowed to since the Z was the distance from the midpoint of the line,

the first one makes sense since it just becomes a point charge of 2lambda L
but the second case, I'm not too sure what it becomes
 
Physics news on Phys.org


consider the form of the field produced by an infinite conductor, which should agree with your 2nd result
 


it helps to re-write the expression in the following form so it is clear when you take the limit

first as follows
E <br /> = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{2\lambda L}{z \sqrt{z^2+L^2}} <br /> = \frac{\lambda}{ 2 \pi\epsilon_0} \frac{ L}{z^2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\frac{L^2}{z^2}}} <br /> <br /> \approx \frac{\lambda}{ 2 \pi\epsilon_0} \frac{ L}{z^2} (1-\left(\frac{L}{z}\right)^2 + O\left(\frac{L}{z}\right)^4)<br /> <br />
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top