What Happens to the Missing Energy in an Inelastic Collision?

AI Thread Summary
In an inelastic collision, such as that observed in the ballistic pendulum experiment, some of the initial kinetic energy of the projectile is transformed into thermal energy and sound, resulting in a discrepancy between initial kinetic energy and final potential energy. This energy loss does not significantly affect the experiment's results because the conservation of momentum still holds true, allowing for accurate measurements of the system's behavior. Factors like air resistance and mechanical inefficiencies may also contribute to energy loss, but they are typically negligible in this context. The experiment demonstrates that while energy is not conserved in the form of kinetic energy, it is conserved overall in the system. Understanding these principles is crucial for interpreting the outcomes of inelastic collisions.
leykis101
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
i did a lab, the ballistic pendulum, and need help with one of the questions in the lab. here it is:
The initial kinetic energy of the projectile is (mv^2/2). The final potential energy of the system is (M+m)gh. However these two values are not equal in this experiment. Explain what happened to the missing energy and why it doesn't really affect the results.
m=the mass of the ball
M=the mass of the pendulum
any help? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think? Hint: What kind of collision does the projectile undergo?
 
if i had to take an educated guess i would have to say that energy is lost to heat when the ball is embedded into the pendulum. because of this the energy at the top is less than the energy at the bottom. I am not sure if this is correct though.
 
Completely correct! The ball and pendulum undergo an inelastic collision, which transforms some of the ball's original KE into thermal energy.

OK, so why doesn't this "loss" of energy affect your results?
 
leykis101 said:
if i had to take an educated guess i would have to say that energy is lost to heat when the ball is embedded into the pendulum. because of this the energy at the top is less than the energy at the bottom. I am not sure if this is correct though.
Indeed, that is correct. So that would make this collision an ######### collision. You could also perhaps mention air resistance, although it is most probably negligable. So why wouldn't this loss of energy affect your experiment?

Edit: The Doc strikes again...
 
the energy conservation formula refer in ideal
why you test many times?... because there are manythings in reality
such as force againts the wind or rusty of metal

Doc Al said:
Completely correct! The ball and pendulum undergo an inelastic collision, which transforms some of the ball's original KE into thermal energy.

OK, so why doesn't this "loss" of energy affect your results?

yes :!) maybe sound and heat
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top