What if the theory of evolution was determined to be false?

  • Thread starter Thread starter moonman239
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Evolution Theory
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario where the theory of evolution is deemed false, and a supernatural being is accepted as the creator of all species, except for those altered by artificial selection. Participants explore how to reconcile this belief with the extensive observations and experimental results that currently support evolution. The consensus suggests that despite rejecting evolution, one could still acknowledge the shared characteristics among all animals, reinforcing the idea of a common connection among species. The conversation emphasizes the futility of dismissing evolution without addressing the substantial scientific evidence that underpins it.
moonman239
Messages
276
Reaction score
0
Let's assume the theory of evolution was determined by scientists to be false and all of us accepted the idea that some supernatural being directly has created and continues to create species, with the exception of artificial selection. (This idea is a form of http://www.wikipedia.com/en/creationism.) How, then, might someone explain the observations & results of all the experiments that seemed to support the theory of evolution?

I think we would still agree that all animals were our "brethren" because of everything all animals have in common with each other
 
Biology news on Phys.org

Thread 'Chagas disease now established in US'

Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
View full post »

Thread 'I need help understanding this quote about recent Natural Selection'

I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
View full post »

Similar threads

How is speciation possible within known confines?
Replies
8
Views
2K
On evolution of humans and that of other animals: any discrepancy?
Replies
14
Views
7K
Synthetic Biology, What Might It Do?
Replies
1
Views
3K
Lokiarchaeota and the Evolution of Complex Cellular Life
Replies
1
Views
4K
How are ancestors classified in a cladistic system?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Is the current human species the result of artificial selection?
Replies
21
Views
15K
Evolution: 24 myths and misconceptions
Replies
13
Views
5K
Can evolution theory work from a plan over generations ?
Replies
18
Views
5K
B Balancing theories and empirical data, especially concerning string theory
Replies
47
Views
8K
Human evolution - From sperm to ape
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top